<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike@ipHouse Blog &#187; Microsoft</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/tag/microsoft/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike</link>
	<description>Spewing from the heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud (updated)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in September, 2009, I had written a post with a quick overview of what a private cloud (or infrastructure) looks like and some basic costs and information, including why it is a great product (I am biased). Since then, Dell has retired the PE2900III model server and items change, this is an update for <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows 7 creates blue screen for your heart</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/10/windows-7-creates-blue-screen-for-your-heart/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/10/windows-7-creates-blue-screen-for-your-heart/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh it is a joke, don&#8217;t take it seriously, but look at what you get in Japan &#8211; the Windows 7 Whopper. Can&#8217;t wait until Apple releases OS XI &#8211; but with garden burger patties&#8230; Click the link to read all about it and watch the video&#8230;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/10/windows-7-creates-blue-screen-for-your-heart/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud on VMware</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last 6 months, I have helped multiple customers achieve their dream of a virtual machine environment built for them exclusively, but with abilities to control their virtual machine setup, configuration, turn up, tear down, etc.  These dedicated infrastructure environments are in the ipHouse data center. This isn&#8217;t &#8216;cloud computing&#8217; as many people think <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ipHouse releases VMware based server services</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtualization, one of the buzzwords flying around the Internet today, is a method of running separate servers (guests) with separate operating systems on shared physical hardware (the host).  I wrote a quick summary back in February, 2009 that should help give some context. Here at ipHouse, we have chosen to use VMware for our virtualization <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/20090413-customer-powerup-down-1.mov" length="14677594" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization War II (VWII)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooh, the virtualization wars are reaching a new level, and with this new video from Microsoft we have reached a new level of marketing misdirection with some future capabilities included. The video focuses on 10 items that VMware says they have over Hyper-V&#8230;that are being refuted by the marketing and tech guy in the video. <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and you &#8211; the business user</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why virtualize?  Better yet, why use virtualized server services for your business? I&#8217;ll try to answer that question in this blog post, though from a service provider point of view, but I&#8217;ll try to remove my bias where feasible. Summary:  For many business needs, a virtualized server on a hosting providers infrastucture is very cost <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Windows Clustering of SQL Server 2005</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/08/windows-clustering-of-sql-server-2005/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/08/windows-clustering-of-sql-server-2005/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Aug 2008 15:32:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS-SQL]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=7</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh my! MSCS is not hard to set up and there are many available walk throughs on the Internet. But now install SQL Server 2005 in failover mode. Step back a sec, what is failover mode you ask? It is a smallish cluster of 2 nodes, one active and one standby. This allows a decent <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/08/windows-clustering-of-sql-server-2005/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/08/windows-clustering-of-sql-server-2005/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/9 queries in 0.009 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 548/557 objects using memcached

Served from: blogs.iphouse.net @ 2012-02-07 06:35:00 -->
