<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike@ipHouse Blog &#187; FreeBSD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/tag/freebsd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike</link>
	<description>Spewing from the heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:03:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The dilemma &#8211; OS updates vs OS type</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years I have been a FreeBSD bigot. I love FreeBSD, the stability, performance, ease of use, and steady progression. But&#8230; Updates are kind of a chore, there is no such thing as true incremental updates, you either do patch updates against RELEASE, or you do world updates against STABLE. I am a STABLE kind <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Distributions vs PHP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The splintering of Linux distributions seems to be continuing! This week, I have had requests for PHP versions 5.3 and 5.2 on both Red Hat EL 5 and CentOS 5 &#8211; though never distribution supports higher than 5.1.6 in the official repositories. PHP 5.2 has been out quite a while. Ubuntu Hardy LTS has it <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud (updated)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in September, 2009, I had written a post with a quick overview of what a private cloud (or infrastructure) looks like and some basic costs and information, including why it is a great product (I am biased). Since then, Dell has retired the PE2900III model server and items change, this is an update for <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shell service available</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been a long week and I had to deal with some red tape internally (of my own creation!), but finally have some working shell service to sell to people who want it. I had posted last week about the issue(s) of shell services and decided that I would do the work to put this kind <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UNIX Shell services, what&#8217;s the fuss?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/unix-shell-services-whats-the-fuss/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/unix-shell-services-whats-the-fuss/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Horse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[UNIX]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wowzers, quite a little thread going on in a newsgroup, but really, what&#8217;s the big deal? I think I know&#8230; Not everyone uses the Internet for viewing web pages and downloading pr0nself-help videos and television shows. The Internet itself has become much easier for the layman to use, and with that, these historical services are <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/unix-shell-services-whats-the-fuss/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/unix-shell-services-whats-the-fuss/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud on VMware</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last 6 months, I have helped multiple customers achieve their dream of a virtual machine environment built for them exclusively, but with abilities to control their virtual machine setup, configuration, turn up, tear down, etc.  These dedicated infrastructure environments are in the ipHouse data center. This isn&#8217;t &#8216;cloud computing&#8217; as many people think <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Sucks! &#8211; a presentation</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/linux-sucks-a-presentation/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/linux-sucks-a-presentation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 16:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA["Linux Sucks!" from Brian Lunduke was a great presentation showing why Linux can't hit mainstream at this point in time.  He does this without creating offense or alienating his audience.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/linux-sucks-a-presentation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ipHouse releases VMware based server services</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtualization, one of the buzzwords flying around the Internet today, is a method of running separate servers (guests) with separate operating systems on shared physical hardware (the host).  I wrote a quick summary back in February, 2009 that should help give some context. Here at ipHouse, we have chosen to use VMware for our virtualization <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/20090413-customer-powerup-down-1.mov" length="14677594" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and you &#8211; the business user</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why virtualize?  Better yet, why use virtualized server services for your business? I&#8217;ll try to answer that question in this blog post, though from a service provider point of view, but I&#8217;ll try to remove my bias where feasible. Summary:  For many business needs, a virtualized server on a hosting providers infrastucture is very cost <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 4)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-4/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The fun is getting going &#8211; ordered up the 8 servers as listed in the configuration in my blog post from October 4th, 2008 on October 14th, 2008. This will give me 8 host systems and one spare on the shelf (I&#8217;ll be using it for test deployments and such as well). Ship date: October 16th, <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-4/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 3.2)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-32/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-32/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:54:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=24</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I measured another system at the office today looking at usage on a 2950 with Energy Smart power supplies, and L series processors (50W each). Idle usage was 2.1A, and when I pushed the system as hard as I could to light up 4 cores the system went to 2.9A of power.  This is .3A <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-32/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-32/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 3.1)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-31/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-31/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:16:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Time for some power measurements! ESXi was the hypervisor involved in the tests. System installed, 4 virtuals powered on, but not doing anything: 2.2A @115V System installed, 4 virtuals being installed hitting the I/O system: 2.4A @115V System installed, 4 virtuals pushing 100% CPU each, no tuning: 2.6A @115V While the virtuals were pushing the high CPU <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-31/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-31/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 3)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-3/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courier-IMAP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dovecot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh noes, part 3 is upon me and now I must be witty or informative.  I am tired today, so I&#8217;ll try for informative. My PE2900 showed up today and has been put into the rack.  I even have a silly picture of its guts&#8230; Wasn&#8217;t that nice?  Say &#8216;yes&#8217; please, it helps my ego <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-3/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-2/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=18</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, the dreaded part 2 of the series. I ordered my test system from Dell on Tuesday, September 30th, 2008, and the box shipped on Thursday, October 2nd, 2008. I am excitedly waiting for it. The box I ordered is to test out the I/O performance for the mail server virtualization, the config is: Quad <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-2/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/10/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and the ISP (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/09/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/09/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2008 14:24:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Parallels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://iphouse.com/blogs/mike/?p=15</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With things changing all over the marketplace, virtualization has, again, come to the forefront as the savior of the data center. And wouldn&#8217;t you know, I&#8217;d like to save my data center, at least some power and cooling needs. I have started to review how we use our servers and where we could do combining <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/09/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-1/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2008/09/virtualization-and-the-isp-part-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
