<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike@ipHouse Blog &#187; Virtualware</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/category/techie/virtualware/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike</link>
	<description>Spewing from the heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Building a sandbox requires planning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean it. 6 servers (5 operational as one is crashing itself repeatedly), 2 switches, and bandwidth. This should be easy to do! I mean: what could go wrong? Nick installed VMware ESXi 5.0 on the physical hardware. I then mounted up a NetApp FAS250, loaded some ISOs, installed Windows Server 2008R2, all smooth. Added <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vCloud Director 1.5 cannot upload files error</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s say you have your vCloud Director cells behind a load balancer. You try to upload your files (.iso and .ovf images for either a vApp or media and receive an error message like: Error: Transferring files On page 98 of the vdc_15_admin_guide.pdf you will find a paragraph pointing out that you need to fill in <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Install of vCloud Director 1.5 fails to set up ESXi 4.1U1 hosts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the install documentation, VMware vSphere 4 ESX and ESXi 4.1 update 1 are supported. Install or upgrade to vCloud Director 1.5 will fail with the following error when trying to add the provider vDC: Could not retrieve state for sequence: seq_os This is easily fixed by editing the database table [os_id] and inserting the <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vCloud Director Cluster got you down?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vCloud Director &#8211; the VMware solution to building on-demand infrastructure for the enterprise and cloud computing&#8230;works. But there are some trials you must encounter and complete before things work smoothly. TL;DR: I failed at first but found the problem with the issue being firewall services blocking inter-cell communications. This post is about the log entry <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud (updated)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 08:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=343</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Back in September, 2009, I had written a post with a quick overview of what a private cloud (or infrastructure) looks like and some basic costs and information, including why it is a great product (I am biased). Since then, Dell has retired the PE2900III model server and items change, this is an update for <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Over Subscription vs Over Capacity &#8211; huh?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/over-subscription-vs-over-capacity-huh/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/over-subscription-vs-over-capacity-huh/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 22:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, a whole slew of tweets showed up across my feed dealing with the perceived and measured issues across multiple public cloud providers infrastructure. One of the posts comes from Chris Hoff (this post in particular) that describes quite clearly what the differences are. Service providers (anyone doing cloud services, virtualization, colocation, bandwidth, whatever) live upon the <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/over-subscription-vs-over-capacity-huh/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/over-subscription-vs-over-capacity-huh/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware releases vSphere 4.0 Update 1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/11/vmware-releases-vsphere-4-0-update-1/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/11/vmware-releases-vsphere-4-0-update-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The crowd cheers! Though that might just be me :) I am very excited for this update and I hope that it goes as smoothly as other updates have gone. I have already updated 2 non-production systems (both ESX) and I am in the process of updating some non-production ESXi servers. One of the items I <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/11/vmware-releases-vsphere-4-0-update-1/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/11/vmware-releases-vsphere-4-0-update-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Example cost: Virtual Private Cloud on VMware</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 21:01:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=226</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the last 6 months, I have helped multiple customers achieve their dream of a virtual machine environment built for them exclusively, but with abilities to control their virtual machine setup, configuration, turn up, tear down, etc.  These dedicated infrastructure environments are in the ipHouse data center. This isn&#8217;t &#8216;cloud computing&#8217; as many people think <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/09/example-cost-virtual-private-cloud-on-vmware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware releases HCL for ESXi 4.0</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/06/vmware-releases-hcl-for-esxi-40/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/06/vmware-releases-hcl-for-esxi-40/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:56:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=221</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whew!  And about perfect timing for me. I was helping a friend understand that he could not operate ESXi 4.0 on his old server because of the requirement for a 64bit CPU environment. Today, VMware released this blog post touting the updates and a link to their actual hardware compatibility list, which covers vSphere 4.0 ESX and <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/06/vmware-releases-hcl-for-esxi-40/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/06/vmware-releases-hcl-for-esxi-40/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware vSphere takes me by storm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-takes-me-by-storm/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-takes-me-by-storm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Official download was available on May 21st, 2009, and I was waiting anxiously for my license keys for the new vCenter (management console) and host license keys (that which is the hypervisor)&#8230; I got them on that day, and then proceeded to spend way too much time with it.  For some people, addiction is a bad thing. <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-takes-me-by-storm/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-takes-me-by-storm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>VMware vSphere &#8211; 1 more day of waiting!</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-1-more-day-of-waiting/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-1-more-day-of-waiting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tomorrow, May 21st, 2009, normal people around the world will get a chance to download VMware&#8217;s newest edition of their infrastructure  &#8217;cloud operating system&#8217; products named vSphere. I am very excited to see what this all entails.  I have read the documents, reviewed the upgrade steps and procedures, have read many a blog entry from those special <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-1-more-day-of-waiting/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/05/vmware-vsphere-1-more-day-of-waiting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ipHouse releases VMware based server services</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Virtualization, one of the buzzwords flying around the Internet today, is a method of running separate servers (guests) with separate operating systems on shared physical hardware (the host).  I wrote a quick summary back in February, 2009 that should help give some context. Here at ipHouse, we have chosen to use VMware for our virtualization <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/iphouse-releases-vmware-based-server-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
<enclosure url="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/wp-content/uploads/2009/04/20090413-customer-powerup-down-1.mov" length="14677594" type="video/quicktime" />
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization War II (VWII)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hyper-V]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oooh, the virtualization wars are reaching a new level, and with this new video from Microsoft we have reached a new level of marketing misdirection with some future capabilities included. The video focuses on 10 items that VMware says they have over Hyper-V&#8230;that are being refuted by the marketing and tech guy in the video. <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/04/virtualization-war-ii-vwii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and you &#8211; the business user</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=42</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why virtualize?  Better yet, why use virtualized server services for your business? I&#8217;ll try to answer that question in this blog post, though from a service provider point of view, but I&#8217;ll try to remove my bias where feasible. Summary:  For many business needs, a virtualized server on a hosting providers infrastucture is very cost <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-the-business-user/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virtualization and you &#8211; general questions</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-general-questions/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-general-questions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 00:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Servers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=83</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my own opinion and some googling around, I have found that there are some basic questions that you should ask yourself when you are looking at using virtual server (machine) services. I&#8217;ll update this list as I come up with new information or receive feedback valuable to most people.   The questions are in <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-general-questions/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2009/02/virtualization-and-you-general-questions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.014 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 914/932 objects using memcached

Served from: blogs.iphouse.net @ 2012-02-07 07:09:34 -->
