<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike@ipHouse Blog &#187; Software</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/category/techie/software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike</link>
	<description>Spewing from the heart</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:22:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Building a sandbox requires planning</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 23:00:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ESXi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genius]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mean it. 6 servers (5 operational as one is crashing itself repeatedly), 2 switches, and bandwidth. This should be easy to do! I mean: what could go wrong? Nick installed VMware ESXi 5.0 on the physical hardware. I then mounted up a NetApp FAS250, loaded some ISOs, installed Windows Server 2008R2, all smooth. Added <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/building-a-sandbox-requires-planning/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storage Cluster; a year in review</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/storage-cluster-a-year-in-review/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/storage-cluster-a-year-in-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Nov 2011 18:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been 17 months since I deployed the Nexenta cluster for our VMware hosting platform at ipHouse. Unfortunately this post will not be positive. Storage system related problems on our Nexenta HA cluster: Thanksgiving weekend, 2010 February into March, 2011 October 22nd, 2011 Thanksgiving weekend of 2010 was not a good weekend.  I later found <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/storage-cluster-a-year-in-review/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/11/storage-cluster-a-year-in-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Monitoring and measurement software, the search</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/10/monitoring-and-measurement-software-the-search/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/10/monitoring-and-measurement-software-the-search/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 20:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load Balancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNMP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=501</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While at VMworld 2011, I spent a lot of time at the expo (where companies were peddling their wares) looking for 2 items. Storage vendors who do things via NFS. Monitoring and measurement companies to help me consolidate the multiple pieces of software we run today. This post is about #2. I looked at a <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/10/monitoring-and-measurement-software-the-search/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/10/monitoring-and-measurement-software-the-search/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vCloud Director 1.5 cannot upload files error</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Let&#8217;s say you have your vCloud Director cells behind a load balancer. You try to upload your files (.iso and .ovf images for either a vApp or media and receive an error message like: Error: Transferring files On page 98 of the vdc_15_admin_guide.pdf you will find a paragraph pointing out that you need to fill in <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/vcloud-director-1-5-cannot-upload-files-error/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Install of vCloud Director 1.5 fails to set up ESXi 4.1U1 hosts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2011 18:36:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the install documentation, VMware vSphere 4 ESX and ESXi 4.1 update 1 are supported. Install or upgrade to vCloud Director 1.5 will fail with the following error when trying to add the provider vDC: Could not retrieve state for sequence: seq_os This is easily fixed by editing the database table [os_id] and inserting the <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/09/install-of-vcloud-director-1-5-fails-to-set-up-esxi-4-1u1-hosts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>vCloud Director Cluster got you down?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 23:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vCloud Director]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtualization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vSphere]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[vCloud Director &#8211; the VMware solution to building on-demand infrastructure for the enterprise and cloud computing&#8230;works. But there are some trials you must encounter and complete before things work smoothly. TL;DR: I failed at first but found the problem with the issue being firewall services blocking inter-cell communications. This post is about the log entry <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/vcloud-director-cluster-got-you-down/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oracle, why do I need X to install?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/oracle-why-do-i-need-x-to-install/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/oracle-why-do-i-need-x-to-install/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 17:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MS-SQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Virtual Infrastructure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is just a rant and should never be read. Need to install Orcale database services for some VMware updates dealing with their vCloud initiative. So, need an RPM based system (CentOS, RHEL, SLES) to do so, okay, I can deal with that I guess. But it also requires X11 to be installed to do <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/oracle-why-do-i-need-x-to-install/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/04/oracle-why-do-i-need-x-to-install/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MySQL, data partitioning, and me</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/01/mysql-data-partitioning-and-me/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/01/mysql-data-partitioning-and-me/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 01:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MySQL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SNMP]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The basics of what I learned using MySQL and how to take live monolithic tables and convert them into partitioned tables without downtime or service interruption, with examples.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2011/01/mysql-data-partitioning-and-me/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DNS MX vs IPv4 &amp; IPv6</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/dns-mx-vs-ipv4-ipv6/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/dns-mx-vs-ipv4-ipv6/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Nov 2010 18:50:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday &#8211; a very interesting issue cropped up&#8230; Another local provider had email warnings being generated that they could not connect to our frontend MX servers. The error itself was: IPv6 is not supported Which is not very clear for a reason email can not be delivered. I mean, my systems are working fine with <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/dns-mx-vs-ipv4-ipv6/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/dns-mx-vs-ipv4-ipv6/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Xfinity vs Hulu direct &#8211; what&#8217;s up?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/xfinity-vs-hulu-direct-whats-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/xfinity-vs-hulu-direct-whats-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:58:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comcast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xfinity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Xfinity, the new name for the Comcast triple play, is using Hulu as the backend content provider. What could go wrong? Oh, maybe the video quality will be 1/2 of what Hulu provides directly! Could be that Comcast is re-compressing the data and I have included the screen captures to prove it. If Comcast isn&#8217;t re-compressing (and I <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/xfinity-vs-hulu-direct-whats-up/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/11/xfinity-vs-hulu-direct-whats-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The dilemma &#8211; OS updates vs OS type</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:03:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For years I have been a FreeBSD bigot. I love FreeBSD, the stability, performance, ease of use, and steady progression. But&#8230; Updates are kind of a chore, there is no such thing as true incremental updates, you either do patch updates against RELEASE, or you do world updates against STABLE. I am a STABLE kind <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/08/the-dilemma-os-updates-vs-os-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A storage cluster is born</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/05/a-storage-cluster-is-born/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/05/a-storage-cluster-is-born/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 23:40:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NAS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nexenta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=389</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is time to add space to our VMware cluster for storage of VMs for our customers. We started initially using Compellent SAN storage. Worked well, had a lot of space, but the performance was not what I was looking for (it is all SATA based), using F/C is far more complicated than we need <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/05/a-storage-cluster-is-born/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/05/a-storage-cluster-is-born/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>42</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Linux Distributions vs PHP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 06:55:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Red Hat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The splintering of Linux distributions seems to be continuing! This week, I have had requests for PHP versions 5.3 and 5.2 on both Red Hat EL 5 and CentOS 5 &#8211; though never distribution supports higher than 5.1.6 in the official repositories. PHP 5.2 has been out quite a while. Ubuntu Hardy LTS has it <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/03/linux-distributions-vs-php/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apache 1.3 &#8211; you were loved</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/apache-1-3-you-were-loved/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/apache-1-3-you-were-loved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 21:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ipHouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load Balancing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[webserver]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, across my RSS feed today, I saw a blurb&#8230; Apache terminates &#8216;outated&#8217; web server What? I clicked the link and was sent off to The Register for their report on the issue. Apache 1.3 was released in July, 1998 &#8211; 12 years ago, and still in operation today. At ipHouse &#8211; we use 1.3 <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/apache-1-3-you-were-loved/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/02/apache-1-3-you-were-loved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shell service available</title>
		<link>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Techie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FreeBSD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Postfix]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VMware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/?p=324</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Been a long week and I had to deal with some red tape internally (of my own creation!), but finally have some working shell service to sell to people who want it. I had posted last week about the issue(s) of shell services and decided that I would do the work to put this kind <a href="http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/" class="more-link">More &#62;</a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.iphouse.net/mike/2010/01/shell-service-available/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/35 queries in 0.031 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 871/940 objects using memcached

Served from: blogs.iphouse.net @ 2012-02-07 06:59:10 -->
